I’ve wanted to be a curator ever
since I learned that it was a real job. What I’ve learned since is that
“curator” can mean many things depending on where it is being applied. At the
Natural History Museum in London for instance the people called “curators” are
what most people at a U.S. museum would call “collection’s managers” while they
call “researchers” those who we would call “curators.” (Don’t worry it will get
more confusing.) Most people in the academic museum community (I include in “museum”
things like herbariums, etc.) view curatorial positions as generally doing some
or all of the following: (1) managing (overseeing) a collection, (2) doing
collections-based research (3) building a collection via fieldwork, (4)
managing loans and gifts from these collections, (5) maintaining these
collections (everything from replacing old jars and labels to upgrading the
data-basing software). Most curators do some but not all these things because some
of these duties fall on the collection’s staff including collection’s managers
and graduate curatorial assistants (if they have the luxury of having such
help). Most curators are doing collections-based research, which can include everything
from range expansion documentation, to taxonomy (descriptions of new species,
revisionary systematics), to cutting-edge evolutionary or ecological studies.
Curatorial
positions are often highly sought after because, as oppose to many other
academic positions, they can require little or no teaching, can include time
for fieldwork, and are often viewed as more fun than your typical arm-chair or
strictly lab-based science. It should be noted that many people do fieldwork
that aren’t curators, and some curators do little fieldwork (shame on them).
Also some curatorial positions have the same teaching load as “regular”
professors, but most have a reduced load. We curators sometimes joke that our
duties include 50% research, 50% teaching and 50% curation. It is true that we
receive little credit for good curation, but the same may be said about teaching
well. It is really nearly 100% research that is being evaluated for someone on the
tenure-track; however, rather than being a burden, a collection for a curator
is a major research tool. A curator can use the products of fieldwork and past
collections to investigate deep Earth history or broad biological questions.
When stable isotope researchers investigating pollution in the Great Lakes need
samples of whitefish from the past 150 years, they can do so knowing that the
University of Michigan Museum of Zoology has many such specimens. When someone
thinks they may have a new species of woodpecker they can visit the many
museums that have closely related species to their putative new taxon for
comparison. The geographic variation, color morphs, sexual dimorphism, ontogenetic
variation, etc., present in many of the species on Earth are housed in
collections somewhere. Not to mention that much of the DNA and RNA based work
being done on animal, plant, fungal and microbial life is based on collections.
Because curators are the experts on a particular taxon, they are often insuring
that the correct scientific identification is connected to the specimen.
Without collections and curators a lab tech that doesn’t know a coelacanth from
a goldfish might report scientific findings from the wrong species. (This
happens more often that you think as tissue samples from specimens that are not
vouchered in a collection get used more and more often – see more on
that HERE]
Some
curators at university-based museums (like LSU, Michigan, Berkeley, Yale,
Harvard to name a few) are professors in academic departments at those
universities. These can be 100% academic appointments where the curator is seen
as a full time member of both the museum and the department, or part time
appointments (e.g., 50%). These appointments typically mean part or all of the
pay, teaching and service obligations rest within the larger academic
department. Some university-based museums are completely autonomous and are
their own separate unit (usually with some adjunct status with another academic
department). Some museums are completely public without any official connection
to a university (e.g., Smithsonian, American Museum of Natural History). The role
curators are playing at each of these institutions can be highly variable but
generally include the five duties described above.
I’m still
not exactly sure how I lucked out at getting a curatorial position. I suppose
if I were to give advice to someone wanting to become a curator that I would
say a few things I did might have put me on the right track. Training at a museum
as an undergrad, grad student or postdoc will put you in touch with the
relatively small museum community. There aren’t that many jobs in museums, but
there are fewer people qualified and competing for a position like “curator of
amphibians and reptiles” than say “ecologist.” The latter may get hundreds of
applications at a typical university, curatorial positions typically have less
than 50 applicants, and of those maybe 10 have the collections-based research
experience to be considered. Doing fieldwork, publishing work based on
collections, and being a curatorial assistant as a grad student can help you
get that collections-based experience. As with applying for any job publishing
lots of good papers, speaking at conferences and getting grants will certainly
get you on the fast track to a job. However, papers alone won’t get you a
curatorial position unless you also have a collections-based research program
to promote.
I was lucky enough to give a TEDx talk about natural history
collections recently, view it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL-9bplZa0E).
Also is you want to learn more about curation or collections, please feel free
to contact me for advice, I will try my give you a frank answer or point you in
the direction of a real expert.
